Women's size preference

The survey below shows how women both choose to have sex repeatedly with men with bigger penises while they stop having sex with smalldicks after the first mistake.

Extract from "Cold facts or hot passion, does size matter"

by Anatoly Protopopov

      The primary data of phallus sizes was obtained exclusively from women, as were inquires regarding the frequency and subjective quality of their sexual interaction with these males based on the reported phallus size. The data collection exercise was carried out during March and April of 2005. The bulk of the respondents reside in Estonia, but additional questionnaires were obtained from Russia. The total sample size of the reporting group was 13 women, aged between 30 and 53, and they collectively reported about sexual interactions with a total of 76 men.
      The group was asked to specify frequency and subjective quality of the interaction. As noted in a previous article by this author, "Phallus as a reflection of hierarchy", the ideal measure of phallus size is based on volume, as opposed to linear length. However, this is not a measure that is readily recalled nor calculable by the female, therefore this study operates with the approximation that phallus length correlates to the volume.
      This study also recognizes that quality and frequency of coitus will not be accurately recalled, particularly as many of the events will have taken place several years ago. To accommodate this, respondents were given ranges of coital frequency to select from, in the event that they were unable to recall the exact number of interactions. These ranges were averaged across their range to give an integer value representing the number of interactions. The total declared frequency of copulation came to 11140, or about three acts per month of viable reproductive life. These figures include the pseudo acts of group 0, which totaled 272. These figures seem to correlate with subjective expectations, based on commonly accepted beliefs.
      For certain reasons, which we cannot divulge for ethical reasons, we believe the reliability of this data to be quite high, for this the author would like to express the utmost gratitude and respect to the volunteers who gathered the information for this study. As you may appreciate, to extract such personal details from complete strangers requires patience, skill, talent and courage to obtain the information without receiving a slap in the face! Thank you all once again.
      The group are spilt into the following five quality categories as follows:

      In addition to quantity of sexual acts, respondents replied about the total number of their sexual partners with the specified size of penis, with husbands, lovers, and the fathers of children being specified separately. The husband was defined as the partner who kept a joint household with the respondent, and played the traditional economic role in the relationship. All other sexual partners were considered as lovers, even for single acts of unsuccessful coitus.
      Most of the partners of the test group were lovers, 63 in total, and 13 husbands. One respondent was never married, and another was married twice, so the total number of husbands was equal to the number of respondents. There were a total of 9 children belonging the test group, 8 of which were to husbands and one to a lover.
      Penis sizes distribution of sexual partners of respondents of different categories is given on fig. 21.

We can see that the maximum number of partners falls into the 16 - 18 cm range for penis size, which is slightly more than the accepted average of penis size in European males, which is 15.2 cm. This supports the assumption that women prefer large phalluses men. However, due to the small deviation from the accepted average size of penis, this cannot be taken as a definitive statement, and a larger sample size would be required to establish this assumption.
      Looking at these figures more closely, it can be seen that the average penis size of a lover was larger than that of husband or father, with the figures showing 15.8 cm, 15.5 cm, and 15.2 cm for lover, husband and father respectively. The latter two figures may seem to contradict expectations that the penis size of a father would be larger than that of a husband.
      Looking at the data regarding the quality of satisfaction achieve from coitus, we refer to the table above where the subjective experience ranges from 0 for no satisfaction to 4 for maximum satisfaction. In Fg 22, this satisfaction data was correlated against the penis size of the partner and the average number of coital acts. From this correlation we can see how penis size relates to the degree of satisfaction and frequency of sexual acts.

It can be seen from the data that the greatest number of sexual acts were with males with an average penis size of 16 - 18 cm, and that these were mainly qualitative acts. The greatest refusal of coitus was given to men with a penis size less than 10cm, and there are no reports of satisfaction of any level with a penis size of less than this size. In the size range of 10 -12 cm, satisfaction is frequent, although maximum satisfaction is rare. In size group of 18 cm and above, maximum satisfaction is frequent, and instances of refusal or no satisfaction is rare
      Fig. 23 shows similar dependences between the penis size and satisfaction with the sexual act; In contrast with fig. 22 averaging was performed, not for men, but for sexual acts. The sum of the count of each group of quality is normalized to 100%; thus, this diagram shows what the contribution size brings to frequency of coituses of given quality. Quality comparisons were performed against other groups, and not internal to the containing group

      In conformity to the data of the previous diagram, the most coitus refusals fall to the owners of less than 10 cm penis, while the 16-18 cm group carried out the majority of all performed acts, from unsatisfactory up to excellent. The excellent acts we most numerous in this group - 62% of all excellent acts were provided by this size group. But this is absolutely not surprising, since this group is most numerous and sexually active. The smallest number of excellent satisfaction was in the 20 cm group. However due to the small sample size of this phallus size, small quantity of sexual acts with them, then it is necessary to search for an explanation of this phenomenon bearing in mind the small number and low-activity. Though this low-activity is not too surprising to me; I have repeatedly mentioned about absence of aspiration for high-ranked men to long-term relationships, and the poor suitability of such males to these relationships. The result of this inquiry seems to confirm this thesis. In other words - men with larger phalluses are likely to be a "vagrant sire", but not "colleagues - supporters", they may not hold appeal to certain woman. However I still can't explain so small quantity of partners of this size group; natural small number of this size group nevertheless looks like insufficiently convincing explanation. It would be interesting to study this phenomenon on more extensive statistics.
      Fig 23 also shows the dependence, shown by deep-lilac colour, between the size of a penis and average quality of the sexual act; The numeric scale of this dependence is placed at the left vertical axis. This, in my opinion is the most eloquent diagram. It can be seen that that quality of sexual contacts with owners of phalluses less than 10 cm is extremely low. On the contrary, acts with owners of large penises (more than 18 cm), is rated highly, with the average quality not lower 3. Also important to note is that in the range from 11 to 17 cm, the variation of reported satisfaction was low, and this result supports the widely observed refutation by women of a direct correlation between the size of penis and their satisfaction from coitus. The vast majority of men (approximately 75-80 %) have a penis within this range of length. Quality variations - from "a little better, than some satisfaction" to "a little less, than good satisfaction", very difficult to notice. This assertion may be supported, if we bear in mind that the average quality of coitus versus penis size increases not so much due to the increase of number of high-satisfaction event, but more to the decrease of events of dissatisfaction. This may be related to subjective factors relating as much to the quality of the coitus, as the emotional affinity of the woman to the partner

Conclusion: The measured dependencies of quantity and quality of sexual contacts with men possessing penises of different size, confirms the possible existence of dependence between rank potential of the man (ranking being directly proportional to penis size) and his sexual appeal to women.

http://protopop.byethost2.com/coldnumbers.html

About the "does size matter?" Ebook:

The "does size matter?" project is my own study of penis and vagina size importance in the context of heterosexual intercourses. The "does size matter?" Ebook is the result of my study and can be found at http://www.tdsmproject.com

I want to say i am totally independent. I never received any money from penis enlargement companies. So, i don't have any benefits saying "size does matter". We hear lots of things about penis size and vagina size. I wanted to start from scratch and reliable data without being influenced by society stereotypes. I wanted to get closer to the truth. So, i created a list of reliable information sources: Medical studies, private studies, my own interview survey, sex therapists, men and women interviews. I rejected any kind of information source that was not reliable. I double checked the information sources with other sources. Then, i listed all the facts about penis size and made some conclusions. In my Ebook, for each fact, there is a reference. I discovered most of what we know about penis size and vagina size in sexual intercourse context was totally wrong most of the time. In fact, this ebook had an unexpected purpose. I discovered i "killed" almost all the stereotypes about penis / vagina size. We hear or read so many things around us that are not based on any scientific datas. I also discovered there is few reliable studies about penis and vagina size, and their importance. So it took a long time gathering my own information from scratch. The results can be found in my Ebook. 

Among other findings, I didn't find any benefits of having a small penis. I didn't find any issue with large penis. i didn't find any proof of vagina size differences.

Size queens had the most interesting feedback when they were describing sex intercourses with large penis. Strangely, they used the same words to describe those sensations. They felt like "controlled", "owned" by the large penis man. They felt like they were in an "animal" state. They felt naturally dominated by his large penis. I think it is a reliable feedback because there is nobody speaking about those "size queens" feelings anywhere over the internet. For the size queens, small penis is too small for vaginal satisfaction. Average penis size is enjoyable if it is a romantic sex and if they are in love. Large penis size is animalistic and more rough. You may think it is a subjective opinion. Nevertheless, we interviewed women from different countries who didn't know each others. Then, in my own findings related to vagina anatomy nothing comes against those comments. 

There were also another profile of women. I called them the "does not matter" profile. They were the majority of women. Nevertheless, they were unable to give precise information. Sometimes they gave false assumptions related to the vagina anatomy. Their feedback was systematically vague. They were for instance unable to give information about physical aspect of sex. However, sex is not virtual. By the way, when i am speaking about large penis, i am speaking about penis length and girth.

Author's opinion:

when i wrote the Ebook, i tried to put aside my own beliefs. My personal opinion is not written anywhere in my Ebook because i didn't want to influence the readers. So, i am writing this paragraph to speak about my personal opinion. Today, i am wondering if all women are not in fact size queens. I found nothing against large penises. On the other hand, i found some anatomical evidences that show women have no problems with large penis. Everything that can be read in internet forums and websites are wrong. With a small penis, the limitations are obvious and everybody denies to see the truth about the physical aspect of sexual intercourse. A huge number of Karma Sutra positions are not possible with a small penis. On the other hand, a man with a large penis can perform any position and give a good penetration quality. I am wondering if sexual males status is not related to their penis size. It has been already proven our ancestors didn't fight to get females. So i think it is all about penis size. Males are the first to see it. When they see a better endowed man they feel inferior. When a woman sees a large erect penis, she feels aroused. According to my research and my own experience, women needs men with large penis to be fully satisfied vaginally. I am convinced small AND average penis sizes is not enough. I am not looking for the reasons. I would like to understand this aspect of nature first. I think large penis men have a domination position. If they have sex with a women she will not be able to resist, she will be naturally submissive to his master. It looks like a natural process with no cultural aspect involved. So the domination relationship between a woman and man can only performed naturally by a large penis man. The larger a penis man will be and the more submissive a woman will be. The shorter a man will be and the more dominant a woman will be. So then, you may wonder what is big enough to be dominant. I don't know. I only think small and average are not big enough to be dominant. Rough sex is not accurate with average penis men because they are not big enough. Then, i think a woman will sexually more please a large penis man than any men with any other small penis size. She will be more committed to him. She will have less expectations with him in the relationship. He will not need to be funny, handsome and rich. On the other hand, she will ask a lot from a small penis man. She will ask him to be funny, rich, nice and clever. Then, the average penis man stands in between. From the interviews, i have been unable to determine how average penis size would shape the male / female relationship. 

The "does size matter?" Ebook is the result of my study and can be found at http://www.tdsmproject.com

An easy choice for women